All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@clusterfs.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:16:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080102211655.GC15898@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102192629.28e67241.diegocg@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:26:29PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> escribió:
> 
> > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, 
> > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel 
> > offered it - and that's definitely not intended.
> 
> But isn't that the whole purpose of having ext4 snapshots in the stable kernel - to
> allow people to try it?

ext4 has quite an unusual development model for kernel code, other 
code in the state of ext4 is usually only in -mm and not in stable 
kernels.

Stable kernels are mainly meant for usage, not for trying stuff.
And although I see a point in perhaps shipping some not-yet-perfect 
device drivers for otherwise unsupported hardware or some
not-yet-perfect filesystems required for accessing foreign
(non-Linux) filesystems, I don't see any point in offering a
WIP Linux-only filesystem in stable kernels.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-02 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-02  1:32 [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2008-01-02 17:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-02 19:51   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-02 21:51     ` Eric Anopolsky
2008-01-04  5:41       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-02 22:43     ` Eric Sandeen
2008-01-02 20:40   ` Alan Cox
2008-01-02 18:26 ` Diego Calleja
2008-01-02 21:16   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-02 21:21     ` Alan Cox
2008-01-02 21:31     ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080102211655.GC15898@does.not.exist \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.