From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:23:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080103072334.GA16176@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102221228.C9D8D26F9A0@magilla.localdomain>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing
> precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the
> HAVE_ prefix than those using it.
The convention is newly established - so no suprise.
> The patch versions I've sent now work
> fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow
> the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would
> be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches
> for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups.
Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger..
Sam
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:23:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080103072334.GA16176@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102221228.C9D8D26F9A0@magilla.localdomain>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing
> precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the
> HAVE_ prefix than those using it.
The convention is newly established - so no suprise.
> The patch versions I've sent now work
> fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow
> the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would
> be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches
> for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups.
Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger..
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-03 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071223183920.GA13976@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20071223211603.3FFB126F8E7@magilla.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20071230163614.GB1384@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20080102044157.A5CC526F99F@magilla.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20080102111431.GD14731@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20080102191030.GA11217@uranus.ravnborg.org>
2008-01-02 21:08 ` [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:08 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:08 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:12 ` [PATCH -mm] x86 compat_binfmt_elf Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:12 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:12 ` [PATCH -mm] x86 compat_binfmt_elf, Re: [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:58 ` [PATCH -mm] x86 compat_binfmt_elf Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 21:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 21:17 ` [PATCH -mm] powerpc compat_binfmt_elf Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:17 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:17 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 21:53 ` [PATCH -mm] compat_binfmt_elf Kconfig Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 21:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 21:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 21:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 22:12 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-02 22:12 ` Roland McGrath
2008-01-03 7:23 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-01-03 7:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-02 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080103072334.GA16176@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.