From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [20/20] x86: Print which shared library/executable faulted in segfault etc. messages
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:06:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801031406.21272.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080103110034.GG29194@elte.hu>
> > And printing the offset into a mapping also always allows to find the
> > correct fault point in a library even with randomized mappings. Previously
> > there was no way to actually find the correct code address inside
> > the randomized mapping.
> >
> > Relies on earlier patch to shorten the printk formats.
> >
> > They are often now longer than 80 characters, but I think that's worth
> > it.
>
> why not make it multi-line? that way the %lx hack wouldnt be needed
> either.
I prefer it single-line. I also disagree on %lx being a hack.
>
> > +void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long ip)
> > +{
> > + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > + vma = find_vma(mm, ip);
>
> grumble. Proper CodingStyle please.
Looks fine to me. If you mean the new line after variables -- that was always optional.
Anyways I'll repost with the error check.
Also it seems like you did apply only parts of the patchkit. If you do that can
you send a list of what patches you didn't add, otherwise it'll be messy to figure
this out from here.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-03 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-03 0:49 [PATCH] [1/20] x86: Make ptrace.h safe to include from assembler code Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:49 ` [PATCH] [2/20] x86: Implement support to synchronize RDTSC through MFENCE on AMD CPUs Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:49 ` [PATCH] [3/20] x86: Implement support to synchronize RDTSC with LFENCE on Intel CPUs Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:49 ` [PATCH] [4/20] x86: Move nop declarations into separate include file Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [5/20] x86: Introduce nsec_barrier() Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 12:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-07 20:01 ` [PATCH] [5/20] x86: Introduce nsec_barrier() II Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [6/20] x86: Remove get_cycles_sync Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [7/20] x86: Remove the now unused X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [8/20] x86: Make TIF_MCE_NOTIFY optional Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [9/20] x86: Don't use oops_begin in 64bit mce code Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [10/20] i386: Move MWAIT idle check to generic CPU initialization Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 10:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [11/20] x86: Use the correct cpuid method to detect MWAIT support for C states Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 12:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [12/20] x86: Use a per cpu timer for correctable machine check checking Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 12:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [13/20] x86: Use a deferrable timer for the correctable machine check poller Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [14/20] x86: Add per cpu counters for machine check polls / machine check events Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [15/20] x86: Move X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC into early cpu feature detection Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 11:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [16/20] x86: Allow TSC clock source on AMD Fam10h and some cleanup Andi Kleen
2008-01-04 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [17/20] x86: Remove explicit C3 TSC check on 64bit Andi Kleen
2008-01-04 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [18/20] x86: Don't disable TSC in any C states on AMD Fam10h Andi Kleen
2008-01-04 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [19/20] x86: Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 12:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 0:50 ` [PATCH] [20/20] x86: Print which shared library/executable faulted in segfault etc. messages Andi Kleen
2008-01-03 6:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-03 11:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 13:06 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-01-03 9:54 ` [PATCH] [1/20] x86: Make ptrace.h safe to include from assembler code Ingo Molnar
2008-01-03 12:57 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801031406.21272.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.