From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAK Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:06:45 +0100 Message-ID: <200801031806.47451.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200712271903.53961.rjw@sisk.pl> <200712271915.17174.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080103104220.GA1732@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:48322 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751580AbYACRE2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:04:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080103104220.GA1732@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Arjan van de Ven , Carlos Corbacho , Linus Torvalds , LKML , pm list , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , Alexey Starikovskiy , "Moore, Robert" On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2007-12-27 19:15:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is > > currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the > > leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions > > are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling > > them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them > > ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the > > ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering > > the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the > > platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up. > > > > Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Seems ok to me, but it is 2.6.25 material earliest, right? Sure, it is. [The patches are on top of 2.6.25 ones, btw. ;-)] Thanks, Rafael