From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JAxYW-0003lh-4g for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAxYU-0003lE-4o for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAxYT-0003kr-OG for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAxYT-0003kf-Fy for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:29 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAxYS-0003JF-Ov for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:10:29 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B823EB24 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:15:14 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:10:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20071231142629.GA19668@thorin> <20080103005537.GA6843@thorin> <20080103010853.GE6843@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20080103010853.GE6843@thorin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801050210.24061.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: spam in commit-grub X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:10:30 -0000 On Thursday 03 January 2008 02:08, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:55:37AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > I wouldn't like to run the risk of missing legitimate mail, specially in > > this case that blocking spam is just a matter of restricting who can post > > to commit-grub (like it happens on this list, which thankfuly is > > completely spam-free). > > Ah, the irony, I think I remember myself complaining that this list didn't > allow post to non-subscribers :-) But actually the list is limited to subscribers. So if you get a spam, probably the from address was identical to a subscriber. Okuji