diff for duplicates of <20080105164403.GA12928@fieldses.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index a85f060..ae2da5e 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,19 +1,15 @@ -On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Tomasz K=C5=82oczko wrote: +On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Jeff Layton wrote: > ->> This is the third patchset to fix the use-after-free problem in lock= -d, ->> and to convert lockd to use the kthread API instead of kernel_thread= -=2E +>> This is the third patchset to fix the use-after-free problem in lockd, +>> and to convert lockd to use the kthread API instead of kernel_thread. >> The main change from the last patchset is the elimination of the ->> svc_create_kthread helper function, and having lockd_up call kthread= -_run +>> svc_create_kthread helper function, and having lockd_up call kthread_run >> directly. I've also made some changes to the function prototype for >> the lockd function to eliminate the need for casting the function >> pointer. > -> BTW kernel, NFS and lockd: SuSE kernel IIRC is distributed with patch= - which=20 +> BTW kernel, NFS and lockd: SuSE kernel IIRC is distributed with patch which > adds kernel-based status monitor (statd). > > Q to NFS people: any plans about merge this in main kernel tree ? @@ -21,7 +17,7 @@ _run No. There was opposition to the idea. I can't remember the argument, though, and a quick google search isn't turning it up. -> And another question related to NFS: any progress on add clear NFS=20 +> And another question related to NFS: any progress on add clear NFS > statistics in kernel (nfsstat -z) ? No. We do have some patches that add roughly equivalent functionality diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fcedd9d..1ef3516 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@ "ref\01198009182-27895-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com\0" "ref\0Pine.BSO.4.63.0712192004140.3875@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl\0" - "ref\0Pine.BSO.4.63.0712192004140.3875-HJEY2/a9Cdz90TmaoATp/9Ui29CwQgaX@public.gmane.org\0" "From\0J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/7] Intro: convert lockd to kthread and fix use-after-free (try #3)\0" "Date\0Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:44:03 -0500\0" - "To\0Tomasz K\305\202oczko <kloczek-HJEY2/a9Cdz90TmaoATp/9Ui29CwQgaX@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0Tomasz K\305\202oczko <kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>\0" "Cc\0Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>" linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org nfsv4@linux-nfs.org @@ -12,22 +11,18 @@ " richterd@citi.umich.edu\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Tomasz K=C5=82oczko wrote:\n" + "On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Tomasz K\305\202oczko wrote:\n" "> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Jeff Layton wrote:\n" ">\n" - ">> This is the third patchset to fix the use-after-free problem in lock=\n" - "d,\n" - ">> and to convert lockd to use the kthread API instead of kernel_thread=\n" - "=2E\n" + ">> This is the third patchset to fix the use-after-free problem in lockd,\n" + ">> and to convert lockd to use the kthread API instead of kernel_thread.\n" ">> The main change from the last patchset is the elimination of the\n" - ">> svc_create_kthread helper function, and having lockd_up call kthread=\n" - "_run\n" + ">> svc_create_kthread helper function, and having lockd_up call kthread_run\n" ">> directly. I've also made some changes to the function prototype for\n" ">> the lockd function to eliminate the need for casting the function\n" ">> pointer.\n" ">\n" - "> BTW kernel, NFS and lockd: SuSE kernel IIRC is distributed with patch=\n" - " which=20\n" + "> BTW kernel, NFS and lockd: SuSE kernel IIRC is distributed with patch which \n" "> adds kernel-based status monitor (statd).\n" ">\n" "> Q to NFS people: any plans about merge this in main kernel tree ?\n" @@ -35,7 +30,7 @@ "No. There was opposition to the idea. I can't remember the argument,\n" "though, and a quick google search isn't turning it up.\n" "\n" - "> And another question related to NFS: any progress on add clear NFS=20\n" + "> And another question related to NFS: any progress on add clear NFS \n" "> statistics in kernel (nfsstat -z) ?\n" "\n" "No. We do have some patches that add roughly equivalent functionality\n" @@ -43,4 +38,4 @@ "\n" --b. -8e01eb700f7922d94eb6ae85a2db0cae54ba240062ddbd9a21f685883e55e26c +04ddaafcbd9c7f5c6c0d12214038a04d6c9b507d055e7b7c31e2d9ff56a44ffa
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.