From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:05:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080105190506.38dcf45e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199528332.7291.53.camel@pasglop>
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:18:52 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 02:04 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:30:37AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >From that I'd suspect that kwindfarm is being a bad citizen.
> > > If a process is consistently stuck in D state, run
> > Windfarm.
>
> It's an unfortunate artifact that kernel threads that do
> non-interruptible sleep are counted as load...
>
> In the case of windfarm, it does a lot (a _LOT_) of accesses to various
> i2c busses and the SMU (the system management unit which controls the
> fans). All those are done in the form of short requests during which the
> process is doing a wait_for_completion() or similar.
>
> I don't see a better way to do that, I think we could have good use of
> something that stops counting those in the load average...
Maybe, but we can usually work around it pretty comfortably.
If smu_set_fan() is only ever called by a kernel thread then we can simply
flip it over to using wait_for_completion_interruptible().
If smu_set_fan() is also called from user processes then things aren't so
easy...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-06 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-30 10:06 Idle loadavg of ~1, maybe MD related Robin H. Johnson
2008-01-05 9:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-05 10:04 ` Robin H. Johnson
2008-01-05 10:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-06 3:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-01-06 3:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-06 11:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-01-06 11:29 ` Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080105190506.38dcf45e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robbat2@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.