From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70765DDE03 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 06:19:24 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Sean MacLennan Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-ibm_iic driver Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:18:22 +0100 References: <477EF225.4070505@pikatech.com> <200801051354.11202.arnd@arndb.de> <477FCE21.9080808@pikatech.com> In-Reply-To: <477FCE21.9080808@pikatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200801052018.22954.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Saturday 05 January 2008, Sean MacLennan wrote: > > Ok. The 44x based .dts files do not list 405-iic, so would I think I > will add two compatibility matches, one for 405 and one for 440EP. That > way I do not break all the current .dts files. Everybody ok with that? > Sounds good. There are obviously no other drivers that know only about 405 but not about 440, so there is no backwards compatibility problem. If we ever get a 450/460/470/... that we want to support with this driver, it can simply claim to be compatible with 440 or 405 if not both. Arnd <><