From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: FUJITA Tomonori Subject: Re: Open-FCoE on linux-scsi Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:28:36 +0900 Message-ID: <20080106103138Q.tomof@acm.org> References: <10A7D0016239E24092DEF05CCC582E4302BB68C8@fmsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> <200801031035.m03AZYcJ012171@mbox.iij4u.or.jp> <477FCD8C.2040404@vlnb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo10.iij4u.or.jp ([210.138.174.78]:59012 "EHLO mo10.iij4u.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951AbYAFB2r (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:28:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <477FCD8C.2040404@vlnb.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: vst@vlnb.net Cc: tomof@acm.org, robert.w.love@intel.com, yi.zou@intel.com, christopher.leech@intel.com, vasu.dev@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jpfujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:33:48 +0300 Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Thus, I believe, that partial user space, partial kernel space approach > for building SCSI targets is the move in the wrong direction, because it > brings practically nothing, but costs a lot. We have not discussed such topic. FCoE target can be implemented fully in user space if I understand correctly.