From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E05DDE9C for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:27:31 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] pseries: phyp dump: reserve-release proof-of-concept Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:26:50 +0100 References: <4782C1A8.3050804@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4782C1A8.3050804@austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200801080126.51897.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: mahuja@us.ibm.com, lkessler@us.ibm.com, linasvepstas@gmail.com, strosake@us.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Manish Ahuja wrote: > Initial patch for reserving memory in early boot, and freeing it later. > If the previous boot had ended with a crash, the reserved memory would contain > a copy of the crashed kernel data. > > Signed-off-by: Manish Ahuja > Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas I think the signed-off-by chain needs to be modified. The way it appears, you handled the patch first, then sent it to Linas, who forwarded it to whoever will take the patches from the list. This obviously isn't true, since you are actually the one who is sending out the patches. Moreover, I believe that the linas@austin.ibm.com address is now dead, and shouldn't be used for this any more. So, depending on which of you two wrote the majority of a patch, I think it should be either | Signed-off-by: Manish Ahuja | Acked-by: Linas Vepstas or | From: Linas Vepstas | Signed-off-by: Manish Ahuja Arnd <><