From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.179]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C948CDDF2F for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:08:05 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Basic Freescale MPC512x support Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:07:58 +0100 References: <1199808093-15929-1-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> <1199808093-15929-3-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> <1199808093-15929-4-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1199808093-15929-4-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200801081907.59052.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: John Rigby List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 08 January 2008, John Rigby wrote: > =A0obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_CHRP)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D chrp/ > =A0obj-$(CONFIG_40x)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D 40x/ > =A0obj-$(CONFIG_44x)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D 44x/ > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_512x)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D 512x/ > =A0obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D 52xx/ > =A0obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D 8xx/ > =A0obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_82xx)=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0+=3D 82xx/ Why do you name the directory 512x instead of 51xx, which would be more consistent with the others? Do you expect other 51xx chips that are mostly incompatible with 512x? Moreover, is it really so different from 52xx that it needs a separate directory? E.g. we often treat the 74xx and 7xx as 6xx variants. Arnd <><