From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755912AbYAHWSh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:18:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755191AbYAHWRE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:17:04 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:35773 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753086AbYAHWRB (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:17:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:16:46 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Christoph Lameter Cc: travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3 Message-ID: <20080108221646.GC21482@elte.hu> References: <20080108021142.585467000@sgi.com> <20080108090702.GB27671@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt > > apply the s390/etc. bits), right? > > Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that > covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think > Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now > conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm. well we cannot really ack it for x86 inclusion without having tested it through, so it will stay in x86.git for some time. That approach found a few problems with v1 already. In any case, v3 is looking pretty good so far - and it's cool stuff - i'm all for unifying/generalizing arch code. Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:16:46 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3 Message-ID: <20080108221646.GC21482@elte.hu> References: <20080108021142.585467000@sgi.com> <20080108090702.GB27671@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt > > apply the s390/etc. bits), right? > > Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that > covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think > Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now > conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm. well we cannot really ack it for x86 inclusion without having tested it through, so it will stay in x86.git for some time. That approach found a few problems with v1 already. In any case, v3 is looking pretty good so far - and it's cool stuff - i'm all for unifying/generalizing arch code. Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org