From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:37:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109013725.GC1133@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478421A6.6050109@goop.org>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>>> +#define GLOBAL_PGPROT(prot) __pgprot(prot | _PAGE_GLOBAL)
>>> +
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_RO GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_RO)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_RX GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_RX)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE_EXEC GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE_EXEC)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_VSYSCALL GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_VSYSCALL)
>>> +#define PAGE_KERNEL_VSYSCALL_NOCACHE GLOBAL_PGPROT(__PAGE_KERNEL_VSYSCALL_NOCACHE)
>>>
>>
>> i suspect you wanted to make GLOBAL_PGPROT a NOP on 32-bit?
>>
>
> Yeah, cut'n'paste from a stale buffer.
ok.
i've updated x86.git with the latest bits, could you double-check it?
Havent applied any pgattr*.c changes yet. Note, it's not fully tested
through yet, so it might have a few rough edges, but wanted to get the
current stuff out.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 22:00 [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 01 of 10] x86: move all asm/pgtable constants into one place Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 02 of 10] x86: avoid name conflict for Voyager leave_mm Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 03 of 10] x86/pgtable: unify pagetable accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 04 of 10] x86: unify pgtable accessors which use supported_pte_mask Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 05 of 10] x86: page.h: make pte_t a union to always include pte element Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 06 of 10] x86/vmi: fix compilation as a result of pte_t changes Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 07 of 10] x86: pgtable: unify pte accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 08 of 10] x86: unify zero_page definition Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 09 of 10] x86: unify paravirt pagetable accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 10 of 10] xen: mask out PWT too Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 9:17 ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-09 19:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:42 ` [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 23:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 0:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:37 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-01-09 0:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 0:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 2:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 3:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 14:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 9:37 ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-09 1:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 0:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080109013725.GC1133@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.