From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from archon.plz.fr (archon.plz.fr [194.50.78.210]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E2BDE06E for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:29:24 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:29:23 +0100 From: Sven Luther To: Matt Sealey Subject: Re: add phy-handle property for fec_mpc52xx Message-ID: <20080109162923.GA6290@powerlinux.fr> References: <20080109140608.GA15673@aepfle.de> <4784E78C.40904@genesi-usa.com> <20080109153511.GA5086@powerlinux.fr> <4784F695.7050507@genesi-usa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4784F695.7050507@genesi-usa.com> Cc: Sven Luther , Olaf Hering , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:30:13PM +0000, Matt Sealey wrote: > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > >Let's just fix this in the kernel, until we get a fixed efika firmware, > >then we can drop it easily enough. But until this happens, we need to be > >able to boot the kernel without any extra work on the users part. > > That is exactly why I don't like the idea. Yes, it makes it easier for users > and easier for distro managers to say "it supports the Efika" but it makes > the Forth fixing, and any further firmware development (ignore the lack of > releases, it means nothing) much harder. efika firmware development is dead. Until we see a release we should assume that the efika is a firmware with breakage, and no upstream support at all. Friendly, Sven Luther