From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is deleting (or reading) files not counted as IO-Wait in top?
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:24:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080114062432.GN155259@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102193503.GA31414@citd.de>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:35:03PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Currently i'm deleting about 500.000 files on a XFS-filesystem which
> takes a few minutes, as i had a top open i saw that 'wa' is shown as
> 0.0% (Nothing else running currently) and everything except 'id' is near
> the bottom too. Kernel is 2.6.23.11.
Simply because the only I/O that XFS does during a delete is
to the log and the log does async I/O and hence the process
never blocks in I/O.
Instead, it blocks in a far more complex space reservation that
may or may not be related to I/O wait....
> So, as 'rm -rf' is essentially a IO (or seek, to be more correct)-bound
> task, shouldn't that count as "Waiting for IO"?
rm -rf is not seek bound on XFS - it's generally determined by
the sequential write speed of the block device or how fast your
CPU is....
> The man-page of top says:
> 'Amount of time the CPU has been waiting for I/O to complete.'
Async I/O means that typically your CPU does not get held up
waiting for I/O to complete....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-14 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-02 19:35 Why is deleting (or reading) files not counted as IO-Wait in top? Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-01-03 0:16 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-01-03 8:25 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-01-05 9:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-05 16:58 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2008-01-14 6:24 ` David Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080114062432.GN155259@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@citd.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.