From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Steve Hardy <steve@linuxrealtime.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:31:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080115113143.6a181fab@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080114222849.GA7279@toshiba-lt>
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:28:51 +0000, Steve Hardy wrote:
> > As far as I know boolean parameters take values 0 and 1, not N and Y.
>
> Not on the systems I am testing on (2.6.24-rc6) - the sysfs interface
> displays boolean parameters as Y/N, and will accept boot parameters as
> either Y/N or 0/1. Below is a snippet from a test proving this point :
>
> test@shtest:~$ cat /sys/module/ads7828/parameters/se_input
> Y
> test@shtest:~$ cat /sys/module/ads7828/parameters/int_vref
> Y
>
> after appending the ads7828.int_vref=N parameter to the kernel
> command-line :
>
> Linux 2.6.24-rc6 (shtest) (16:53 on Saturday, 05 January 2002)
>
> login: test
> test@shtest:~$ cat /sys/module/ads7828/parameters/int_vref
> N
Oh. This is news to me, thanks for the information.
> Is it more "correct" to refer to 1/0 in the documentation?
> I just naturally used the same syntax provided by the sysfs nodes
Nah, just scratch this comment of mine, I just didn't know that Y/N was
working for booleans. If you prefer that to document that form that's
alright with me.
(I do believe that it was a mistake to allow two different ways to do
the same thing, but that's a different issue.)
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Steve Hardy <steve@linuxrealtime.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI ADS7828 A-D
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:31:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080115113143.6a181fab@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080114222849.GA7279@toshiba-lt>
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:28:51 +0000, Steve Hardy wrote:
> > As far as I know boolean parameters take values 0 and 1, not N and Y.
>
> Not on the systems I am testing on (2.6.24-rc6) - the sysfs interface
> displays boolean parameters as Y/N, and will accept boot parameters as
> either Y/N or 0/1. Below is a snippet from a test proving this point :
>
> test@shtest:~$ cat /sys/module/ads7828/parameters/se_input
> Y
> test@shtest:~$ cat /sys/module/ads7828/parameters/int_vref
> Y
>
> after appending the ads7828.int_vref=N parameter to the kernel
> command-line :
>
> Linux 2.6.24-rc6 (shtest) (16:53 on Saturday, 05 January 2002)
>
> login: test
> test@shtest:~$ cat /sys/module/ads7828/parameters/int_vref
> N
Oh. This is news to me, thanks for the information.
> Is it more "correct" to refer to 1/0 in the documentation?
> I just naturally used the same syntax provided by the sysfs nodes
Nah, just scratch this comment of mine, I just didn't know that Y/N was
working for booleans. If you prefer that to document that form that's
alright with me.
(I do believe that it was a mistake to allow two different ways to do
the same thing, but that's a different issue.)
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-15 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <477D50CC.6020504@linuxrealtime.co.uk>
2008-01-04 7:34 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI Steve Hardy
2008-01-04 7:34 ` [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI ADS7828 A-D Steve Hardy
2008-01-10 0:30 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI Andrew Morton
2008-01-10 0:30 ` [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI ADS7828 A-D Andrew Morton
2008-01-10 13:19 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI Jean Delvare
2008-01-10 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI ADS7828 A-D Jean Delvare
2008-01-14 22:28 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI Steve Hardy
2008-01-14 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI ADS7828 A-D Steve Hardy
2008-01-15 10:31 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-01-15 10:31 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-03 17:59 [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI ADS7828 Steve Hardy
2007-12-12 10:25 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/1] : hwmon - new chip driver for TI Andrew Morton
2007-12-18 20:56 ` Steve Hardy
2007-12-19 14:54 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-19 15:35 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080115113143.6a181fab@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=steve@linuxrealtime.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.