From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:44:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801161544.15884.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080116142242.GA23993@elte.hu>
> Index: linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/page.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-x86.q.orig/include/asm-x86/page.h
> +++ linux-x86.q/include/asm-x86/page.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> #define PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK (PAGE_MASK & __PHYSICAL_MASK)
I haven't tested yet, but we looked at that one earlier and I thought
it was ok because
#define __PHYSICAL_MASK _AT(phys_addr_t, (_AC(1,ULL) << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1)
and
typedef u64 phys_addr_t;
for PAE. So the expression above should have been already 64bit.
> -#define PTE_MASK PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK
> +#define PTE_MASK (_AT(long, PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK))
That would mean it is 32bit again because 32bit long is 32bit, but on 32bit
PAE PTE_MASK definitely needs to be 64bit.
So I would be surprised if the patch works.
The problem seems to be rather that PAGE_MASK does not include the bits above 32bit.
Something like
#define PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK (__PHYSICAL_MASK & ~(phys_addr_t)(PAGE_SIZE-1))
should work (untested)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-16 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-15 22:17 [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 22:17 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] x86: refactor mmu ops in paravirt.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 22:17 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] x86: fix warning Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 22:17 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] x86: clean up pte_modify Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-16 0:43 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-15 22:17 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] x86: mask NX from pte_pfn Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-18 13:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-01-18 14:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 15:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-15 22:35 ` [PATCH 0 of 4] x86: some more patches Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 23:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-16 0:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-16 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 14:44 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-01-16 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 15:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 15:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-16 15:42 ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-16 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 16:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 17:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-16 17:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-16 17:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-16 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 20:59 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-16 21:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 21:35 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801161544.15884.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.