From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFUhK-0003aH-6x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFUhF-0003ZX-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFUhF-0003ZU-HS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:17 -0500 Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFUhE-0006Ij-6U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:22:53 +0000 From: Thiemo Seufer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] Add a PowerPC branch detector Message-ID: <20080117132253.GE9767@networkno.de> References: <478EF8E3.2050503@csgraf.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478EF8E3.2050503@csgraf.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Alexander Graf wrote: > PowerPCs have static instruction lengths, so writing an "in-between" brl > detection is quite simple on this architecture. You are welcome to write > something like this for any other platform, but if a compile doesn't > trigger build errors on PowerPC, it shouldn't on other platforms either, > as PowerPC has quite advanced branch instructions. > > This patch is not mandatory, makes debugging a lot easier though. > Index: qemu-snapshot-2008-01-15_05/dyngen.c > =================================================================== > --- qemu-snapshot-2008-01-15_05.orig/dyngen.c > +++ qemu-snapshot-2008-01-15_05/dyngen.c > @@ -1488,6 +1488,16 @@ void gen_code(const char *name, host_ulo > if (get32((uint32_t *)p) != 0x4e800020) > error("blr expected at the end of %s", name); > copy_size = p - p_start; > + > +/* blr check for inline returns */ > + > + if(strstart(name, "op_", NULL) && !strstart(name, "op_exit", NULL)) { > + for(p=p_start; p < p_end - 4; p+=4) { > + if ((get32((uint32_t *)p) & 0xfc00fff0) == 0x4c000020) { > + error("Inline blr detected in %s. Please append FORCE_RET to the function.", name); > + } > + } > + } Is check_ops.sh not enough for debugging micro-ops? Thiemo