From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JFcwq-0004ER-7m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:56 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JFcwp-0004DW-Cd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:55 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFcwp-0004DL-9G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:55 -0500
Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1JFcwo-0008Jq-P5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:10:55 -0500
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:11:42 +0000
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license
Message-ID: <20080117221142.GH28842@networkno.de>
References: <8a6cde920801171244k35d84ec9vf82277d2e5090a4f@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080117.140706.232931235.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<478FC8B9.6000801@gmail.com>
	<20080117.144458.63053471.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080117.144458.63053471.imp@bsdimp.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <478FC8B9.6000801@gmail.com>
>             "Bill C. Riemers" <docbill@gmail.com> writes:
> : According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> : contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
> 
> I said exactly this in a previous message.  At one point I recalled
> seeing some code that was gpl2-only in the tree.  I can't find it now,
> so either I'm mistaken, or it has gone away.

JFTR, there are hw/ac97.c, hw/acpi.c and hw/pl031.c.


Thiemo