From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: about mini-os Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:27:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20080122122701.GK4365@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <298d852f0801220123q4adca9f5y36dd3784ea60c872@mail.gmail.com> <20080122113036.GE4365@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <298d852f0801220416p5b66e389yaed0a012d56644bd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <298d852f0801220416p5b66e389yaed0a012d56644bd@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?utf-8?B?5L2Z5LiK?= Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org 余上, le Tue 22 Jan 2008 20:16:54 +0800, a écrit : > You mean I can't run mini-os in dom0 ? > But for learning purpose I really want to . Well, I don't really see the use. mini-os completely relies on backends and is unable to drive any real hardware. Why not running e.g. a Linux as dom0 and then run mini-os as domU? That makes a much faster testing environment. > Maybe I need some more hacks ? Well, the hack you propose is indeed necessary, but I doubt it should really make it in upstream Samuel