From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Megaraid: Use of outb_p Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:37:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20080122213735.GP27250@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080118204113.GF20490@parisc-linux.org> <9738BCBE884FDB42801FAD8A7769C26501E60213@NAMAIL1.ad.lsil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:59407 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752391AbYAVVhg (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9738BCBE884FDB42801FAD8A7769C26501E60213@NAMAIL1.ad.lsil.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Yang, Bo" Cc: Alan Cox , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, DL-MegaRAID Linux On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:30:12PM -0700, Yang, Bo wrote: > Alan/Matthew, > > I found inb_p/outb_p are defined as inb/outb in kernel src. So it > should not have problems to change inb_p/outb_p to inb/outb. That's not true for x86-32. Please, can you look up the documentation for this chip and find out what sort of delay it needs? -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."