From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@openvz.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:31:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123133149.GA4059@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0801172000430.32679@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Hi!
> I thought that one could place a printk anywhere without worrying.
> But it seems that it is not wise to place a printk where the runqueue
> lock is held.
>
> I just spent two hours debugging why some of my code was locking up,
> to find that the lockup was caused by some debugging printk's that
> I had in the scheduler. The printk's were only in rare paths so
> they shouldn't be too much of a problem, but after I hit the printk
> the system locked up.
>
> Thinking that it was locking up on my code I went looking down the
> wrong path. I finally found (after examining an NMI dump) that
> the lockup happened because printk was trying to wakeup the klogd
> daemon, which caused a deadlock when the try_to_wakeup code tries
> to grab the runqueue lock.
Could try_to_wakeup use trylock, and only avoid wakeup if lock is
already held?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-23 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 1:04 [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-18 1:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-18 1:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 11:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-01-18 11:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 14:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-01-18 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-18 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-23 13:31 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-01-23 18:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-24 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080123133149.GA4059@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=adobriyan@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.