From: Andy <genanr@emsphone.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: multipath performance
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:38:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080123163820.GA1303@thumper2> (raw)
I did some basic dd tests to get an idea of the speed of multipath vs
individual devices, some of the numbers seem not to make sense.
I ran several test with dd, 4 at a time reading different parts of the
device.
multibus - round robin among paths rr_min_io=1, 4 paths
individual - each dd going to a separate path
dd with iflag=direct
multibus : 120 MB/s
individual : 115 MB/s
dd without direct
multibus : 44MB/s (why is this so bad)
individual : 160MB/s (why is this so good)
Why is multibus without direct the worst, yet individual devices without
direct is the fastest. And why doesn't multibus perform about the same as
going to the individual devices (25% performance hit using multibus)?
Multibus is round-robin, how about a mode that sends io out on all paths
simultaneously?
Another thing I noticed during some of my test is that performance for a
single dd will increase in the multibus mode as I up the blocksize parameter
of dd.
Thanks,
Andy
next reply other threads:[~2008-01-23 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-23 16:38 Andy [this message]
2008-01-25 1:59 ` multipath performance malahal
2008-01-28 21:52 ` Andy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080123163820.GA1303@thumper2 \
--to=genanr@emsphone.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.