From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioemu: directly project all memory on x86_64
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:38:44 +0000
Message-ID: <20080123163844.GL4252@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20080123155159.GC5188@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<C3BD1C23.1B583%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C3BD1C23.1B583%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser, le Wed 23 Jan 2008 16:30:27 +0000, a écrit :
> I don't really want the memory-size parameter back. What if we support
> memory hotplug in future (e.g., we could do now if the guest decides to
> balloon in some memory higher up in its memory map)?

Well, the question holds for ia64 too, which already projects all
memory.

> Anyway I don't see what getting rid of the mapcache fixes.

Well, that was mostly to speed up memory lookup in the usual case, I
don't really need it.

Samuel