From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JHxm3-0001MX-BD for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:49:27 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHxm1-0001Ix-J1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:49:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHxm0-0001HQ-UW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:49:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHxm0-0001HD-PO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:49:24 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHxm0-00052H-9r for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:49:24 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FAE3EB27 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:55:30 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:49:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4794EC4B.8080301@prolly.org> <20080123115724.GF27060@thorin> <47976145.8050507@prolly.org> In-Reply-To: <47976145.8050507@prolly.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801240949.22350.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: netboot/UNDI status X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:49:25 -0000 On Wednesday 23 January 2008 16:46, Douglas Ward wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > >> But to be honest, there are more important issues than networking in > >> the short term... > > > > ACK. Let's focus on what GRUB excels at, instead of trying to compete > > with etherboot just yet... > > actually what i need isn't something that competes with etherboot/gpxe > but something that competes with pxelinux. I hate using the word "compete". There is no fact that we are competitors. Their targets are simply different, and we have been collaborating with etherboot/gpxe. Okuji