From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756229AbYAYLNw@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756229AbYAYLNw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:13:52 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752583AbYAYLNm
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:13:42 -0500
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52160 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752740AbYAYLNl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:13:41 -0500
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:13:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Further shrink ifdef sections in fault.c
Message-ID: <20080125111327.GC20026@elte.hu>
References: <1201223157.16972.172.camel@brick>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1201223157.16972.172.camel@brick>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0059]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:

> +	if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
> +		return -1;

ah, this explains the weird chunk in your other patch.

	Ingo