From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JIW1e-0003Kw-89 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:23:50 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIW1d-0003Kr-Da for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:23:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIW1b-0003Ke-UD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:23:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIW1b-0003Kb-MA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:23:47 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JIW1b-00021X-8k for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:23:47 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978AA3EB23 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:29:59 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:23:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4794EC4B.8080301@prolly.org> <87bq7al1pa.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20080125132515.GA5196@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20080125132515.GA5196@thorin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801252223.45714.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: netboot/UNDI status X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:23:49 -0000 On Friday 25 January 2008 14:25, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:00:17AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" writes: > > > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:42, Robert Millan wrote: > > >> Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver collection > > >> that's even better, of course. This was done for GRUB Legacy, right? > > > > > > Sure. I had a very short conversation with gpxe developers last year, > > > and we have agreed that we should share work. In GRUB Legacy, we tried > > > to keep etherboot drivers as intact as possible, and we contributed > > > back by providing bug fixes. IMO, this should be continued in GRUB 2 as > > > well. > > > > Please correct me if I am wrong, but aren't some files licensed under > > the GPL, with an additional demand that you shouldn't use it outside > > etherboot? > > Just one driver is known to do that. Check our BTS. > > Besides, it might even be illegal to distribute those drivers, even as part > of etherboot. Right. Maybe I should contact gpxe developers, if they still have it. Okuji