From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tools - Remove machine setting from
	HOSTCFLAGS
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:46:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20080127164632.GA8360@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <20080127161220.GA6621@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
	<C3C263C2.12EF4%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C3C263C2.12EF4%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:37:22PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Then you would not have 'uname -m' indicating x86_64 or amd64, and so
> XEN_COMPILE_ARCH would be x86_32 by default?

No. uname -m == x86_64 and XEN_TARGET_ARCH = x86_64, but the system
lacks critical parts to execute the x86_64 binaries.

Bastian

-- 
Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude.
		-- Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8