From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758378AbYA2MVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:21:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754180AbYA2MVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:21:11 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:49444 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752467AbYA2MVK (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:21:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:21:04 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sgrubb@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, ghaskins@novell.com, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, tong.n.li@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, menage@google.com, rientjes@google.com Subject: Re: scheduler scalability - cgroups, cpusets and load-balancing Message-Id: <20080129062104.7237b3c6.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080129123223.GM1044@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1201600428.28547.87.camel@lappy> <1201604243.28547.101.camel@lappy> <20080129123223.GM1044@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org vatsa wrote to Peter: > After reading your explanation in the other mail abt what you mean here, > I agree. Ah good - glad someone understood that. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214