[U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

[Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>]

On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > I'd really like to see a common layer for SPI flash though, so I don't
> > > mean to criticise your effort. But it would be nice if not every new
> > > SPI client came with its own low-level SPI functions...
> >
> > i know exactly where you're coming from, so dont sweat it.  my purpose
> > was to get things integrated and then take a look at the existing pieces
> > and unify them.  easier i think to have known working code to throw at a
> > common framework than code for hypothetical uses we cant actually break
> > our teeth on.
>
> Ok, don't worry about it then. I just wanted to make sure you
> investigate the API(s) we already have before you propose something
> new.
>
> So let's just make "please use the include/spi.h API for low-level SPI
> access" be one of the comments on your RFC :-)

do you  have a git tree for this so i can pull it down and test it for 
Blackfin ?  i can see about posting an updated implementation then ...
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080129/a4fc0fe7/attachment.pgp