From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933564AbYA2Qdw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:33:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757490AbYA2QdW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:33:22 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:37950 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881AbYA2QdU (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:33:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:33:13 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: "Gregory Haskins" Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, menage@google.com, rientjes@google.com, tong.n.li@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sgrubb@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: scheduler scalability - cgroups, cpusets and load-balancing Message-Id: <20080129103313.46b52442.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <479F06A4.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> References: <1201600428.28547.87.camel@lappy> <1201604243.28547.101.camel@lappy> <20080129053005.bc7a11d7.pj@sgi.com> <1201607401.28547.124.camel@lappy> <20080129061202.95b66041.pj@sgi.com> <479F06A4.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gregory wrote: > What about exclusive cpusets? Don't they create a > new sched-domain or did I misunderstand there? cpu_exclusive cpusets no longer determine sched domains. I just said more in this in an earlier reply. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214