From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Philipp Reisner To: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] DRBD 8.0; Make sure barrier is sent after last data block in epoch Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:37:05 +0100 References: <342BAC0A5467384983B586A6B0B3767107E8A3F8@EXNA.corp.stratus.com> In-Reply-To: <342BAC0A5467384983B586A6B0B3767107E8A3F8@EXNA.corp.stratus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801291437.06285.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Simon, Back from travelling...=20 I have applied the two patches you sent Yesterday. 0001-Make-sure-barrier-is-sent-AFTER-last-data-block-in-e.patch 0002-Make-sure-we-dont-set-CREATE_BARRIER-flag-when-conne.patch BTW, I did white space changes to them.=20 Since we propagate changes from 8.0 to 8.2, and in 8.2 we try follow the Linux coding style hard, it makes things easier for us when the patches follow the Linux coding style in the first place. =46rom the other patch bomb I still intend to merge=20 0010-Ensure-that-state-updates-cannot-be-done-out-of-orde.patch Regarding the other patches from patch bomb #1, I wanted to write an summay, which patches where accepted, which are not yet applied for what reasons. ... But then I went to the "Open Source Meets Business" Conference and now I can not=20 remember...=20 Simon, from your point of view, what patches to we missed from patch bomb #1 ? =2DPhil =2D-=20 : Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner Tel +43-1-8178292-50 : : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Vivenotgasse 48, 1120 Vienna, Austria http://www.linbit.com :