From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JKuLp-0006ej-2b for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:46:33 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKuLm-0006cK-U2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:46:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKuLm-0006bS-44 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:46:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKuLl-0006bG-Sz for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:46:29 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKuLl-0002tQ-H9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:46:29 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205433EB26 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:53:08 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:46:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <61125.201.21.145.69.1201816431.squirrel@webmail.sistemafenix.com.br> <20080131221856.GA21803@thorin> <1201818924.4747.45.camel@dv> In-Reply-To: <1201818924.4747.45.camel@dv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802011246.27225.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: who want money???? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:46:31 -0000 On Thursday 31 January 2008 23:35, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > I think I told you. What's the problem? > > You may want to copy the message to the personal address. > > I guess the mailing list needs to be reconfigured to stop rewriting > Reply-to, as recommended here: > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html The author is a typical clever person who assumes that everybody should migrate to a good mailer. It's too different from the reality. > My webmail honors the "reply to all" button, but Evolution honors > "reply-to", and it's quite possible that Evolution is more standard > compliant. Not really. No RFC defines what a mail user agent _must_ do with "reply to all". If I am wrong, let me know. > If I have a suspicion that the original author is not subscribed, I add > the personal address to cc:, but it's easy to forget. > > The reply-to setting is here (password protected): > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/admin/grub-devel > > Of course, it's possible that the poster just wants more personal > attention. Then it's a pretty good deal :-) My policy is that Reply-To should be set to a mailing list, if it is a member-only list, where there is no reason to send a reply to individuals. I do this, because I frequently observe that people respond to from addresses when Reply-To is not set. From my point of view, the harm is bigger when not set. Okuji