All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:33:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080201143302.GC26232@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A0AE4E.5090400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


* Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> The CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set and the system seems not be truly locked 
> up ,btw wc -l of the softlockup messages is around 108 times, while 
> running the libhugetlbfs only and this is reproducible with the 
> 2.6.24-git7 also.

Peter just fixed a handful of bugs in this area - does the patch below 
help?

	Ingo

------------------>
Subject: debug: softlockup looping fix
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

Rafael J. Wysocki reported weird, multi-seconds delays during
suspend/resume and bisected it back to:

  commit 82a1fcb90287052aabfa235e7ffc693ea003fe69
  Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
  Date:   Fri Jan 25 21:08:02 2008 +0100

      softlockup: automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

fix it:

 - restore the old wakeup mechanism
 - fix break usage in do_each_thread() { } while_each_thread().
 - fix the hotplug switch stmt, a fall-through case was broken.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/softlockup.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
 
 	now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
 
+	/* Wake up the high-prio watchdog task every second: */
+	if (now > (touch_timestamp + 1))
+		wake_up_process(per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu));
+
 	/* Warn about unreasonable delays: */
 	if (now <= (touch_timestamp + softlockup_thresh))
 		return;
@@ -191,11 +195,11 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	do_each_thread(g, t) {
 		if (!--max_count)
-			break;
+			goto unlock;
 		if (t->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 			check_hung_task(t, now);
 	} while_each_thread(g, t);
-
+ unlock:
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 }
 
@@ -218,14 +222,19 @@ static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
 	 * debug-printout triggers in softlockup_tick().
 	 */
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		touch_softlockup_watchdog();
-		msleep_interruptible(10000);
+		schedule();
+
+		if (kthread_should_stop())
+			break;
 
 		if (this_cpu != check_cpu)
 			continue;
 
 		if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
 			check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(this_cpu);
+
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -259,13 +268,6 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		wake_up_process(per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu));
 		break;
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
-	case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
-		if (!per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu))
-			break;
-		/* Unbind so it can run.  Fall thru. */
-		kthread_bind(per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu),
-			     any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map));
 	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
 	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
 		if (hotcpu == check_cpu) {
@@ -275,6 +277,14 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 			check_cpu = any_online_cpu(temp_cpu_online_map);
 		}
 		break;
+
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
+		if (!per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu))
+			break;
+		/* Unbind so it can run.  Fall thru. */
+		kthread_bind(per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu),
+			     any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map));
 	case CPU_DEAD:
 	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
 		p = per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu);

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-01 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30  6:41 [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs Kamalesh Babulal
2008-01-30 16:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 17:05   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-02-01 14:33     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-05  6:32       ` Kamalesh Babulal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080201143302.GC26232@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.