From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Hejtmanek Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git9 ACPI oops - regression Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:17:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20080201211734.GD4199@ics.muni.cz> References: <20080201132551.GA4199@ics.muni.cz> <200802011529.20167.rjw@sisk.pl> <200802011207.03211.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802011207.03211.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List , Kristen Carlson Accardi List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:07:03PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > this worked in 2.6.24? At least in 2.6.24-rc8 seemed to be OK, for the first time, I encounter= ed the bug in 2.6.24-git4. 2.6.24-git6 seemed to be OK. 2.6.24-git9 is not.=20 > You are running the "dock" driver in both cases? I use thinkpad acpi module, ACPI_DOCK is always built in. > Is this reproducible? In 2.6.24-git4, it was 100% reproducible - just pressing undock button = on the dock and the oops has been generated. In 2.6.24-git9, I do not know, whether it is reproducible or not. And a= s I'm ill and my dock is in work, I'm not sure when I be ready to test it aga= in. > If yes, please open a bugzilla entry here: >=20 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=3DACPI > Component =3D Config-hotplug >=20 > and attach the output from acpidump do you need just acpidump as is or should I do acpidump when docked? --=20 Luk=E1=B9 Hejtm=E1nek