All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Chris Rankin <rankincj@yahoo.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - ATA problem?
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 05:44:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080203044428.GA10139@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802022243.13710.gene.heskett@gmail.com>


* Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that one came from me, but it also gets over 14,000 hits on 
> google.
> 
> Now Jeff, here is the strange part.  That error was killing me, many 
> times an hour and eventually crashing completely, repeatedly.
> 
> I applied that kernel argument acpi_use_timer_override once and have 
> not had the error since, and that includes one test of a full let it 
> cool for a minute powerdown reboot to see if it would come back, which 
> it did not.
> 
> That argument causes the kernel to log this as its responding to that 
> command:
> 
> [   27.097095] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
> [   27.097287] ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> [   27.107291] ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> [   27.107343] ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ...  failed.
> [   27.107346] ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ... failed.
> [   27.117353] ...trying to set up timer as ExtINT IRQ... works.
> 
> The last 4 lines above are not logged without that argument.  So my 
> theory ATM is that this forced the kernel to initialize something in 
> the boards registers that it does not initialize without that command, 
> and that its going fubar as shown in the msg quoted above is a totally 
> random thing, perhaps dependent on the phase of one of jupiters moons 
> as to what state it powers up in.  And I got lucky, so far in that my 
> single powerdown reset didn't trigger it again...  And you _know_ what 
> that knocking sound is by now. :)

that's weird. Could you try the hack below and _remove_ the 
acpi_use_timer_override flag? The change should artificially cause the 
above 4 lines to appear again, in all cases.

This would test the following aspects of your theory: is this unknown 
side-effect of the the acpi_use_timer_override flag related to the timer 
setup sequence in io_apic_32.c? If not, then the difference most likely 
lies in the different ACPI setup sequence.

	Ingo

---
 arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
@@ -2208,7 +2208,7 @@ static inline void __init check_timer(vo
 		 * Ok, does IRQ0 through the IOAPIC work?
 		 */
 		unmask_IO_APIC_irq(0);
-		if (timer_irq_works()) {
+		if (timer_irq_works() && 0) {
 			if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) {
 				disable_8259A_irq(0);
 				setup_nmi();

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-03  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-02 23:56 [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - ATA problem? Chris Rankin
2008-02-03  1:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-03  3:43   ` Gene Heskett
2008-02-03  4:44     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-03  4:50       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03  5:11       ` Gene Heskett
2008-02-03  5:58         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03  6:25           ` Gene Heskett
2008-02-04 19:13             ` Mark Lord
2008-02-05  4:44               ` Gene Heskett
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-02 23:40 Chris Rankin
2008-02-03  0:38 ` Daniel Hazelton
2008-02-03 17:36   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-03 18:16     ` Daniel Hazelton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080203044428.GA10139@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rankincj@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.