From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m14CqSi4017815 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:52:28 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m14Cq7xI010183 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:52:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:51:29 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Message-ID: <20080204105129.1bc23bdf@gaivota> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Patch series to add soc_camera virtual v4l2 and its users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:12:25 +0100 (CET) Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > Following the first preliminary version I posted on 11.01 to this list, > > following this message I am posting the soc_camera driver, an SoC part for > > the PXA27x CPU, two camera drivers, a platform-specific part, that's not > > yet in the mainline, so, so far this is only an example, and an auxiliary > > i2c driver for a GPIO extender. Also two fourcc codes and a new control > > are added to the V4L2 API. A lot of changes since the previous version, > > including all new names. This patch series is against 2.6.23. There seem > > to have been a few significant changes around v4l2 since then, so, forward > > porting it to 2.6.24 will need some work too. But the good news is, that I > > do not expect to significantly change this driver any more. So, please > > review, comment, and test if you can. > > Mauro, you probably saw this my patch series and the following discussion. > A question to you - I have fixed all issues pointed out by Trent Piepho > and Sakari Ailus in my local tree, now I have to forward port the patches > to > > ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git master > > After this is done, would you be prepared to accept them or do you see any > principle problems with those patches? On a quick look, they seem ok. Yet, I would prefer if you later move the sensors interface to use v4l2-int-device. This will allow future reusage of those drivers with other cameras. I should be analyzing your series today and commit if all are ok. Cheers, Mauro -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list