From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATH] ioemu: use SIGHUP instead of SIGKILL
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:26:46 +0000
Message-ID: <20080204112646.GD5205@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20080204110730.GA6936@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<C3CCA59E.13422%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C3CCA59E.13422%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser, le Mon 04 Feb 2008 11:21:02 +0000, a écrit :
> Although this looks potentially reasonable, I'm not sure about the approach
> of SIGHUPing a dom0 'proxy' process to kill an hvm stub domain. How hard
> would it be to teach xend just enough about hvm stub domains to have it
> directly kill the stub domain at the same time as it kills the normal hvm
> domain?

It also needs to know that it has to kill the VNC client, etc.

That said, I'm wondering how to transmit the name of the stub domain.
Could the device model for instance write it in xenstore ?

Samuel