From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:00:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080204150044.GK18392@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080203191540.3cb2660b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:15:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the
> > > ext4 patchset.
> >
> > That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How quickly
> > will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches?
>
> They're about 1,000 patches back.
OK, if you're not planning on pushing David's changes to Linus right
away, what if I pull in David's
iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch
and push it plus some other ext4 bug fixes directly to Linus, and let
you know when that has happened so you can drop David's patch from
your queue?
David's changes to ext4 can be applied standalone without the rest of
his series, so it would be safe to push that to Linus independently
and in advance of the rest of his series. That should also help
reduce the number of inter-patch queue dependencies.
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-04 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 20:18 - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
2008-02-03 20:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 1:36 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-04 3:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 15:00 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-02-04 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-04 20:30 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-05 9:40 ` David Howells
2008-02-05 21:26 ` Mingming Cao
2008-02-06 1:02 ` Mingming Cao
2008-02-06 1:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 2:21 ` Mingming Cao
2008-02-04 20:24 ` merge plans, was " Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-04 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-05 9:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-05 9:53 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080204150044.GK18392@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.