From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: Fast checkpoints with COW VM memory Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:39:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20080205103950.GA4322@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20071205220535.GA4431@york.uk.xensource.com> <478D78CB.8010406@sina.com.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Mike Sun Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Mike Sun, le Mon 04 Feb 2008 22:14:26 -0500, a écrit : > is there a way for me to determine if the protection fault is the > result my my COW action as opposed to a protection fault actually > incurred by the guest (i.e. perhaps the guest OS is implementing its > own COW on portions of its memory)? Not that I'm aware of. > The only method I can think of is to keep track of the > protection bits of the pages before I have the hypervisor modify them > to read only, Yes. Samuel