From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JMjCp-0001pA-QG for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:16:47 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMjCn-0001nC-OK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:16:45 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMjCl-0001mr-9o for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:16:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMjCl-0001mo-4L for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:16:43 -0500 Received: from aybabtu.com ([69.60.117.155]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMjCl-0004r7-2f for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:16:43 -0500 Received: from [192.168.10.6] (helo=thorin) by aybabtu.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JMjCi-0001xo-P8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:16:42 +0100 Received: from rmh by thorin with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JMjAw-0005sO-R6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:14:50 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:14:50 +0100 From: Robert Millan To: The development of GRUB 2 Message-ID: <20080206121450.GC22114@thorin> References: <20080203163933.GJ1756@kirkkit.kollasch.net> <20080205202322.GL1756@kirkkit.kollasch.net> <1202261023.460.4.camel@k9.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1202261023.460.4.camel@k9.localnet> Organization: free as in freedom X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Thunderbird! www.mozilla.com/thunderbird X-Debbugs-No-Ack: true User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: multiboot2 vs. grub2 implementation X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:16:46 -0000 On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:23:44PM -0800, walt wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 14:23 -0600, jakllsch@kollasch.net wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:11:23AM -0800, walt wrote: > > > jakllsch@kollasch.net wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> In the course of actually trying to use the MultibootDraft, I've > > >> discovered > > >> some places where the draft and the grub2 implementation differ... > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > Are you using grub2/cvs with or without Bean's latest multiboot patch? > > > > I tend not to be aware of these things. I'm using stock sources. > > > > > It still hasn't been committed, and I was about to ask about it anyway. > > > Without that patch, multiboot doesn't work. > > > > Hmm. > > Agreed :o) Bean's patch had some whitespace corruption anyway, so here > it is again, diffed against today's latest cvs grub2: If you just fixed whitespace, it is better if we just use patch -l or Bean fixes it. Otherwise it means more paperwork and legal stuff :-/ Bean, where you going to commit that patch? -- Robert Millan I know my rights; I want my phone call! What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.)