All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:07:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080209140711.GA16205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080209113435.GA6915@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>

On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 12:34:35PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Using CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ on s390 my system always
> gets stuck when running with more than one cpu.
> When booting with four cpus I get all four cpus caught withing cpu_idle
> and not advancing anymore. However there is the init process which is
> waitung for synchronize_rcu() to complete (lcrash output):
> 
> STACK TRACE FOR TASK: 0xf84d968 (swapper)
> 
>  STACK:
>  0 schedule+842 [0x36c956]
>  1 schedule_timeout+172 [0x36d0e4]
>  2 wait_for_common+204 [0x36c398]
>  3 synchronize_rcu+76 [0x567bc]
>  4 netlink_change_ngroups+150 [0x2b4302]
>  5 genl_register_mc_group+256 [0x2b6174]
>  6 genl_init+188 [0x534e44]
>  7 kernel_init+444 [0x518334]
>  8 kernel_thread_starter+6 [0x192a6]
> 
> If I change the code so that timer ticks won't be disabled everything
> runs fine. So my guess is that rcu_needs_cpu() doesn't do the right
> thing for the rcu preemptible case.
> 
> Kernel version is git head of today.
> 
> Any ideas?

Does this tree have http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/29/208 applied?

If not, could you please check it out?

						Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-09 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-09 11:34 preempt rcu bug on s390 Heiko Carstens
2008-02-09 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-02-09 17:14   ` Heiko Carstens
2008-02-09 22:02     ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-10 13:01       ` Heiko Carstens
2008-02-10 17:43         ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-11 15:37         ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080209140711.GA16205@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.