From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <ide+bug@ml.breakpoint.cc>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Current git --> kaboom [bisect] seems IDE related.
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080210144352.GA3537@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802101438.46698.bzolnier@gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:38:46PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> The OOPS is most likely (again) my fault - I was rushing out to push out
> the fix and memset() line didn't get converted.
The new patch works fine for me.
> I prepared the new patch, documented it and started looking into SCSI
> build breakage... and I no longer feel comfortable with the hack :(
>
> It seems that fixing IDE properly will be easier than auditing the whole
> SCSI for all the weird assumptions on rq->cmd[] size (James?) so I'm back
> to the code, in the meantime here's the updated patch:
Yeah, this is quite nasty. I'll attach the patch below which just
rejects a command in scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd if it's too large for
the scsi_cmnd cmnd array. This is probably enough but I haven't
audited all of the scsi code yet. But as James said this is
too much of a memory vastage to put it into the tree.
Long-term the Panasas folks have looked into killing the scsi_cmnd.cmnd
filed entirely and make the struct request.cmd field dynamically sized
which would solve your problem, but probably won't be ready for 2.6.25.
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2008-02-10 07:49:50.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2008-02-10 15:19:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -1129,7 +1129,12 @@ int scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struct scsi_d
req->buffer = NULL;
}
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(req->cmd) > sizeof(cmd->cmnd));
+ if (req->cmd_len > sizeof(cmd->cmnd)) {
+ scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
+ scsi_put_command(cmd);
+ return BLKPREP_KILL;
+ }
+
memcpy(cmd->cmnd, req->cmd, sizeof(cmd->cmnd));
cmd->cmd_len = req->cmd_len;
if (!req->data_len)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-10 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-09 19:32 Current git --> kaboom [bisect] seems IDE related Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-09 20:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-09 21:22 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-09 23:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-10 13:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 14:19 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-10 18:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 19:51 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-02-10 23:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-11 16:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-02-11 19:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-10 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-02-10 15:07 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 18:59 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 19:05 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Let scsi_cmnd->cmnd use request->cmd buffer Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 17:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-12 18:10 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 19:41 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-13 9:24 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] block layer varlen-cdb Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-12 17:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 18:07 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 19:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-12 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-12 18:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-25 15:57 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] Is it time for " Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080210144352.GA3537@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=ide+bug@ml.breakpoint.cc \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.