All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linux-tiny@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:33:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080212083323.6d579dc3@crazy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202756478.28085.35.camel@cinder.waste.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]

Hi Matt,

Thanks for your review.

Le Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:18 -0600,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> a écrit :

> Looks ok. Please preserve original authorship (ie me) in some fashion
> in your description.

Andrew seems to already have picked up the patch in -mm (I received an
e-mail + x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch added to -mm tree).
If I resend a new one with proper credits, will Andrew pick it up and
replace the old version by the new version ?

> > On top of this patch, I've tested if removing the big dmi tables in
> > the code (for example in arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c) would allow to
> > make more space optimizations. However, it seems that simply
> > defining dmi_check_system() to an empty static inlined function
> > already allows gcc to optimize out the dmi tables, because there
> > are not present in the code. Is that possible, or is my
> > understanding incorrect ?
> 
> That's possible with modern gccs, yes.

I was compiling with 4.2.3, which I suppose is a modern gcc.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-11 16:58 [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code Thomas Petazzoni
2008-02-11 19:01 ` Matt Mackall
2008-02-12  7:33   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2008-02-12  7:42     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080212083323.6d579dc3@crazy \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=Linux-tiny@selenic.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.