From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757910AbYBMIrd (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:47:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755165AbYBMIrO (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:47:14 -0500 Received: from hpsmtp-eml13.KPNXCHANGE.COM ([213.75.38.113]:38591 "EHLO hpsmtp-eml13.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754742AbYBMIrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:47:13 -0500 From: Frans Pop To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [stable 2.6.24] WARNING: at kernel/time/clockevents.c Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:47:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john stultz References: <200802101440.22118.elendil@planet.nl> <20080212230741.576b8004.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802130947.10781.elendil@planet.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2008 08:47:11.0140 (UTC) FILETIME=[05DAEE40:01C86E1D] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:21 +0100 Frans Pop wrote: > > the hrtimer code is preparing an invalid ktime_t. Note that > > clockevents_program_event() actually fails when this happens - I am > > surprised that this is not causing observeable userspace problems. > > > > The WARN_ON_ONCE() means that you'll only see this warning once per > > boot. But the actually error could be happening any number of times > > without being reported. > > > > Looks pretty serious? > > Yes. It's the same problem, which got fixed with: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit >;h=62f0f61e6673e67151a7c8c0f9a09c7ea43fe2b5 OK, so probably glibc performs a unit test during build that asks for a long sleep. I guess that makes sense. Thanks Thomas and Andrew.