From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765891AbYBMXYa (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:24:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932506AbYBMXXg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:23:36 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:44545 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932473AbYBMXXe (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:23:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:22:54 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: minyard@acm.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] IPMI: Update driver version Message-Id: <20080213152254.c4942331.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080213163048.GF9830@minyard.local> References: <20080213163048.GF9830@minyard.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:30:48 -0600 Corey Minyard wrote: > Enough bug fixes and changes that we need a new driver version. Are none of them serious enough to warrant a 2.6.24.x backport?