From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: kbdif
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:23:18 +0000
Message-ID: <20080213182318.GG4378@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20080213174137.GF4378@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<8763wsenbm.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8763wsenbm.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Markus Armbruster, le Wed 13 Feb 2008 19:14:05 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com> writes:
> 
> > Mmm, I can't find any event related to buttons in kbdif.h, was it just
> > forgotten?
> >
> > Samuel
> 
> XENKBD_TYPE_KEY, BTN_LEFT etc.

Ah ok.
Is there a reason for requiring fb and kbd to be initialised "in
parallel"?  I mean, hw/xenfb.c requires the kbd to be created, then
the fb to be created, then the kbd to be initialized, then the fb to be
initialized, then the kbd to be connected, then the fb to be connected.

I would have thought that creating/initializing/connecting kbd first and
then eventually fb would be allowed.

Samuel