From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add rcu_assign_index() if ever needed
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080214033209.GA7266@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080213220515.GA10642@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:05:15PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> This is a speculative patch that as far as I can tell is not yet required.
> If anyone applies RCU to a data structure allocated out of an array, using
> array indexes in place of pointers to link the array elements together,
> then the rcu_assign_index() function in this patch will be needed to
> assign a given element's array index to the RCU-traversed index. The
> implementation is exactly that of the old rcu_assign_pointer(), so is
> extremely well tested.
>
> The existing rcu_assign_pointer() will emit a compiler warning in cases
> where rcu_assign_index() is required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> rcupdate.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.24-rap/include/linux/rcupdate.h linux-2.6.24-rai/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> --- linux-2.6.24-rap/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2008-02-13 13:36:47.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rai/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2008-02-13 10:55:40.000000000 -0800
> @@ -286,6 +286,24 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
> })
>
> /**
> + * rcu_assign_index - assign (publicize) a index of a newly
> + * initialized array elementg that will be dereferenced by RCU
^^^^^^^^
I hope Andrew got that one while porting against the latest -mm :)
Looks good otherwise.
> + * read-side critical sections. Returns the value assigned.
> + *
> + * Inserts memory barriers on architectures that require them
> + * (pretty much all of them other than x86), and also prevents
> + * the compiler from reordering the code that initializes the
> + * structure after the index assignment. More importantly, this
> + * call documents which indexes will be dereferenced by RCU read-side
> + * code.
> + */
> +
> +#define rcu_assign_index(p, v) ({ \
> + smp_wmb(); \
> + (p) = (v); \
> + })
> +
> +/**
> * synchronize_sched - block until all CPUs have exited any non-preemptive
> * kernel code sequences.
> *
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-14 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 22:00 [PATCH 1/2] remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with type/macro safety Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-13 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] add rcu_assign_index() if ever needed Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-14 3:32 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2008-02-14 3:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-14 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-14 17:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-14 18:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-13 22:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with type/macro safety Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080213143537.1b806790@extreme>
2008-02-13 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <20080213144233.05e860cb@extreme>
2008-02-13 23:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-13 23:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-14 0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-14 0:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-14 0:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-14 0:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-14 1:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-14 1:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-13 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-13 23:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-02-13 23:57 ` David Miller
2008-02-14 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 0:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-16 1:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080214033209.GA7266@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.