From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
Cc: jdmason@kudzu.us, bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
discuss@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:20:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080215152008.GA1975@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080215074827.GE4334@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
> initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for
the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-15 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 0:15 "ide=reverse" do we still need this? Greg KH
2008-02-13 0:16 ` pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary " Greg KH
2008-02-13 2:17 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-13 4:45 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 12:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-13 17:28 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 18:16 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 22:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-13 23:41 ` Greg KH
2008-02-14 0:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-14 4:58 ` Greg KH
2008-02-14 13:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-02-14 7:44 ` [discuss] " Andreas Jaeger
2008-02-14 12:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-02-15 7:17 ` Greg KH
2008-02-20 0:39 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 9:32 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-13 17:32 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 17:47 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-13 18:14 ` Greg KH
2008-02-15 7:17 ` Greg KH
2008-02-15 7:48 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-15 15:20 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-02-15 15:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-15 15:46 ` yong xue
2008-02-15 18:28 ` Greg KH
2008-02-17 7:53 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-02-13 1:41 ` "ide=reverse" do we still " Rene Herman
2008-02-13 4:44 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 12:06 ` Rene Herman
2008-02-13 12:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-13 12:46 ` Rene Herman
2008-02-13 22:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-02-13 12:57 ` Rene Herman
2008-02-14 17:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-02-15 13:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-13 2:43 ` Ken Moffat
2008-02-13 4:43 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 15:32 ` Ken Moffat
2008-02-19 15:08 ` Ken Moffat
2008-02-13 7:54 ` [discuss] " Dirk GOUDERS
2008-02-13 8:26 ` Greg KH
2008-02-13 8:54 ` Dirk GOUDERS
2008-02-13 20:00 ` Dirk GOUDERS
2008-02-13 20:48 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080215152008.GA1975@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.