From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gcosta@redhat.com, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: + acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:28:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802152128.m1FLSMGi024897@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
acpi: use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: acpi: use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk
From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in
acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK events
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/processor_core.c~acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c~acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk
+++ a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -890,9 +890,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handl
switch (event) {
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
- printk("Processor driver received %s event\n",
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Processor driver received %s event\n",
(event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
- "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
+ "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"));
if (!is_processor_present(handle))
break;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from gcosta@redhat.com are
remove-is_processor_present-prototype.patch
acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk.patch
git-kvm.patch
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-15 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-15 21:28 akpm [this message]
2008-02-15 22:12 ` + acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk.patch added to -mm tree Len Brown
2008-02-15 23:21 ` Glauber Costa
2008-02-16 23:33 ` Thomas Renninger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802152128.m1FLSMGi024897@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.